These headwinds come on top of the coronavirus crisis. Most countries are fighting to hit a balance within various factors. Including preserving public health, obtaining a return to a semi-normal level of economic activity, and defining violations on individual rights.
In this setting, the hope is that today’s extensive liquidity forms approved and backed by central banks will remain to produce a connection to a better 2021. Not only to change the economic and social loss but also to achieve further profits to investors. But will this bridging work, be enough to defeat what a more complex pandemic mixture is?
Fresh economic data shows that, outside of China and several other countries, the economic improvement persists notched and unpredictable. It fell short of what is both required and probable. Travel, hospitality, and other service-sector projects face significant difficulties, hindering the overall work picture. Furthermore, many businesses in different sectors attempt “resizing” actions that will probably direct to less employing or even a stream of job terminations.
Appending to these economic difficulties are increasing political doubts, particularly in the US. Donald Trump’s coronavirus infection has, moreover, compounded an already highly questionable election method. And now that several lawmakers have also caught the virus, congressional deliberations on many essential matters have been paused.
Coronavirus Crisis and US Senate
The US Senate has limited time to think anything other than a new supreme court justice proposal
The Republican majority requests stirring through before the end of Trump’s term. In conclusion, only restricted concern exists for a new fiscal relief package, pro-growth fundamental reforms, or any other significant US policy actions in the next couple of weeks.
Meantime, US assistance in multilateral policy discussions – not to mention its worldwide leadership role more regularly – remains reduced. Making circumstances even more complicated, economic and financial answers outside are also hitting the ceiling. Especially in the developing countries, where governments are falling out of policy space, thanks to high deficits, growing debt, and more unstable currency dynamics.
This policymaking contingency will see an increase in the extensive struggle to meet the three main goals of the pandemic era. They include managing public health and preserving citizens; dodging additional damage to the social fabric, economic welfare, and financial viability; and reducing restrictions.
Notwithstanding this unpredictable, unsettling, and inherently volatile mixture of background circumstances, stocks and other risk assets have displayed remarkable flexibility. Most prominently, a significant share of investors has been amenable to continue “buying the dip” either because they consider “there is no option” to stocks or because substantial market bounces over the past couple of years have stoked their “concern of missing out.”
